Kitsap county property search tax

Your ancestors may be found in court records as defendants, plaintiffs, witnesses, or jurors. Court records can clarify family relationships, places of residence, occupations, and family history. See Washington Court Records for courts used through the years.

Kitsap County

Guardianship of orphans or adults unable to manage their own affairs were handled by the probate and the District courts. See Washington Court Records. Local histories for Kitsap County, Washington Genealogy may include biographies, history of churches, schools, local government with names of officials, military information, and more.

See Washington Local Histories. Historical County Boundaries from Newberry Library [7] Emphasis for this timeline is on events that affected migration, records, or record-keeping. Unless otherwise mentioned, the events below were gleaned from Wilma, David. Land records especially deeds may give the name of a spouse, heirs, and witnesses, who may be relatives or in-laws. County deeds, mortgages, and leases show transfers from person to person. See also Court Records for actions involving real estate. See Washington Land for government-to-person records.

This map highlights the county within the state of Washington. The map soon will have inter-active links. Most residents came to Washington from other states or crossed the border from Canada. See Seattle Passenger Lists for those who came from other countries. Although few other migration records exist, try:. See Washington Naturalization and Citizenship for more information. Small town newspapers provide historical content and contain obituaries, birth or death notices, legal notices, and community news, such as visits to or from out-of-town relatives.

See Washington Newspapers for tips, resources, and details. Additional newspapers abstracts can sometimes be found using search phrases such as Kitsap County, Washington Genealogy newspapers in online catalogs like:. Obituaries may mention birth, marriage, spouse, parents, living family members, education, occupation, and more.

See Washington Obituaries for state level collections and United States Obituaries for tips and insights.


  • sled south carolina criminal background check.
  • salt lake city white pages free.
  • Kitsap County WA - Online Payments.

Probate records identify heirs of the decedents, give the approximate death dates, and provide specifics about property holdings. The records were kept by the county judge.

Property Tax | Bainbridge Island, WA - Official Website

These include wills, inheritance records, dockets, and other documents regarding property and estates of individuals who have died. See also Court Records for civil actions involving estates. Also see Washington Probate Records. Public records are documents created by civil authorities that either don't fit comfortably in another topic, or that could fit in several topics. Washington tax records complement land records and can supplement the years between censuses. There may be gaps of several years in the tax records of some counties. For more information, see the wiki page Washington Taxation.

The county auditors in Washington kept records of birth , marriage , and death.

The county clerk has the divorce records - the earliest dates to the present. See Washington Vital Records for details and history of the records. In , coroners, physicians, and midwives were to "return" births and deaths to the county auditor. Many went unrecorded. In , the State Center for Health Statistics assumed this responsibility. See Washington Online Genealogy Records for indexes. Also see Washington Birth Records. Marriage records include certificates, marriage returns, license applications or affidavits.

Counties kept the records until , when the state took over. Also see Washington Marriage Records. Divorce records give the names of the parties and may give the date and place of their marriage. The court stated:.

It must be remembered that cases applying the Williams test have dealt principally with situations involving non-Indians. In these situations, both the tribe and the State could fairly claim an interest in asserting their respective jurisdictions. The Williams test was designed to resolve this conflict by providing that the State could protect its interest up to the point where tribal self-government would be affected.

Furthermore if the state tax imposed on an Indian or a non-Indian would substantially interfere with a discernible federal policy to aid the Indian, the tax would be invalid. Sohol v. Clark , 78 Wn. Clallam County , 73 Wn. The interference may not be treated as substantial if it is too remote to be legally sufficient to invalidate the tax.

County of Riverside , F. The court stated at page City of Detroit [ U.

" + siteNameBegin + "

The court specifically noted the position taken by Holmes, J. Oklahoma , U. Texas Co. In Sohol v. Clark, supra , the court in dealing with the analogous case of allotted and restricted Indian lands recognized that principle on page n. It is no longer the rule that a tax upon the leasehold interest of one who leases allotted and restricted Indian lands is a tax upon the power to lease and thus promote destruction of that power.

The theoretical burden which the tax imposes on such lands is too remote and indirect to justify immunity for that reason alone. In various cases the federal courts have held that personal property owned by non-Indians but held on an Indian reservation or other Indian land, is subject to state taxation. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.

Missoula County , U. Evans , U.


  • Volunteers / Senior Tax Exchange Program (STEP).
  • Public Records Search.
  • risk factors for juvenile sex offenders?
  • ' + galleryRecords[i].photoname + '!
  • how to find tax id number.
  • Kitsap County, WA Property Tax Search by Address.

Gay , U. County of Riverside, supra; Truscott v. Hurlbut Land Cattle Co. Sangre de Cristo Dev. Erie County , 31 F. As already noted, prior Washington cases involving the state's personal property tax have involved Indian taxpayers owning personal property on Indian land. Makah Indian Tribe v.